Figures, Expression and Body Language

Last rough for Duck Island, my new early reader in progress:

This is the climax of the story, and what I was trying to get a across was a kind of boundless joy. It seemed simple enough, but this was one of the hardest parts of the book to draw.

Expression and Body language in Kid's Books, or: Why am I so Damned Slow? 

So you've got 25 pages, and just a handful of words to tell  a story. So everything has to count. Which means every figure has to say something with few or no words to say it.

Recently I've been kicking myself for taking too long to draw figures. At times it's taken me two full work days to resolve one single figure. I can draw an entire landscape of animals, but figures are the killer.

Alex Raymond: Beautiful Figures and  Broad Strokes

As a fan of comic books as a kid (and I continue to be a fan), particularly superhero and adventure comics, I envied and marveled at how artists were able to draw sometimes hundreds of figures every month. Then it occurred to me more recently that most of these figures had a range of about three or four expressions. This is more than adequate for an adventure story based on action and movement--where the figure's dynamism is more important than emotion. Every once in a while  there would be a figure that would convey something subtle in their stance or expression, but largely it was about lyrical movement and action. Other times the figures were more iconic, like cyphers, as in the case of Tintin. Alex Raymond, who did Flash Gordon of the 30s, was and still is a favorite:

When I was first developing my kid's book portfolio, it was enough for me just to get kid anatomy right.  Now I'm thinking more and more about how to convey emotion, and more importantly, how kids convey emotion. Andwhen you take a closer look at some of the best of the children's illustrators, there's a little more going on in this department:

Maurice Sendak

Hilary Knight

Arnold Lobdell

But some of the best comics artists are also capable of a little subtlety when called for:

Dan Clowes

Jaime Hernandez

So without the tyranny of a comic book artist's deadline, I'm still feeling my way through this. And so it's taking some time.

Revisions, Revisions, Revisions

More Revisions on my soon to be submitted book dummy.

My writing buddy Shannon pointed out something I knew I needed to do but was too lazy to follow through with. the pumpkin needed to match the same level of render as the bugs on this one. I also beefed up the moon, adding a glow and some realistic moon texture:

I really think this improves the image dramatically and more accurately reflects the interior art, so yay, Shannon!

At the as usual right on target advice of my agent Abigail, I added more darks to this one, and used some more dry brush to make it look more rounded. I distorted the base of the candle to follow the contour of the inner wall of the pumpkin and added shadows to make it look more grounded. I also added a purple compliment into the bugs cast shadow. I like the new dry brush as well because it gives the candle more radiance.

I just finished all the rough art for my other dummy in progress,  Duck Island (you may have noticed that I've been posting that art periodically) and am in progress on a couple of finishes which I should be posting soon.

Once again, loving InDesign as a compositional tool. It's so easy to move pages and add pages and delete pages. It really gives you a sense of the ultimate layout of the book, makes it easier to break the text down into pages. It's also an instant digital dummy if you want to send it to a POD printer to get a hard copy. 

New Duck Island Rough

Mock-up Cover For Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle.

I recently redid the original drawing that inspired my book in progress, Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle as a cover for the Book Dummy. The dummy is a mock-up of the book to give the editors an idea of what the finished book will look like. It's composed of all the illustrations roughed out, with a few finishes. Here's the original:

The first thing I did was redraw the original images of Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle to match my new character designs. The changes were minor, and so I was able to use some of the original coloring and modeling that still existed on a layer in the original Photoshop file.

I zoomed in, got rid of the branches to make room for the lettering. I also took out the light coming from the moon so the lettering would contrast more with the background. The lettering is hand drawn. To make the lettering look spontaneous, but still deliberate and clean, I draw each letterform numerous times until I get the lettering I want. I want the lettering to be distinct with its own identity, so it doesn't look like any other title lettering that I've done, but is still in my style. The lettering is done with cheap rough brush from Michael's to give it that hand-painted look.

And here's the finished cover:

Inevitably they're going to want to go with a different cover for the finished book, but this should do nicely for the dummy. Already I'm thinking that I want the pumpkin to be a bit more modeled in the finished book, with more natural texture, but at this point I think it does the job it needs to. 

New Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle Color Spread

So I'm working with my agent Abigail Samoun to get this Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle picture book dummy into shape before we sent it off. she suggested I render one more finish, the spread where Gentlemen Beetle shows Ladybug the interior of the pumpkin.

Here's the texture for the interior done up in dry brush. I ultimately did a lot of photoshop tweaks on this to get it the shape I needed. Abi and I discussed how the interior should have a pulpy feel.

And the inks for the candle:

inspirational Work by A. Paul Weber

Andreas Paul Weber (1893-1980) was born in Arnstadt Thuringia and worked principally in the Weimar period when all those great German Expressionists were doing their German Expressionist thing. He illustrated Baron of Münchhausen, among other books, and spent 3 years in jail for criticizing the Third Reich.

Good Stuff!

New Figure Drawing, and Sucking Less

After being ill for so long I've only recently gotten back into drawing the figure from life, and it's definitely true: if you don't use it, you lose it. It's taken me a few sessions to get back to something resembling my old groove. I'm pretty happy with this one, considering.

And a gesture:

Another Duck Island Rough, Working With My Favorite Model

Kid poses are getting a little easier. I had some photo ref, but not these specific poses. When you try to get a seven year old to pose, they look very...posed. So I just gave my favorite model some general instructions.

"You're talking to the ducks!"

"You're shaking hands with a duck!"

"You're sneaking up on them!"

"Dancing! No, just silly dancing this time! Not ballet dancing!"

It's as fun as it sounds. And exhausting. It's exhausting just watching a seven year old. I don't know how you parents do it. The photos give me a feel of the general action and the body language of a real kid and I work from there. As a general rule, I age down. The kid's book kid age is usually around 5, but I've found that 5 year olds are even more unruly than 7 year olds, so 7 tends to do the job.

 The worst is a reluctant kid. They really have to be into it, or it's a no go! The most frustrating thing in the world is trying to get a reluctant kid to work with you. So the last time I had a kid model I tried to make sure by asking, "are they into it? Because if they're not into the idea, then it's probably not going to work. I'm always grateful to the adults and to the kids of course, but it's better when they want to be there and aren't compelled to be there.

As a reward I give them posters of some of my work (if you'd like a poster of your own, you can get one, here at an economical price), which the kids seem happy with. Awhile back I let my favorite model keep the foam rubber sword and axe I got from Target for a buck each when we were doing pirates, and she seemed to appreciate it.

Always searching for cooperative and enthusiastic kid models in the Davis area. And now that it's summer I also provide popsicles!

Oops!

I just realized I accidentally reused two ducks in this illustration from the previous image! Those ducks were far in the background, and mostly cropped and will  eventually be re-inked and probably a little redrawn in the finish so it shouldn't matter much, but reusing art always seems like a cheat, so it's something I really try to avoid.

So do you think you can spot the culprits in the previous post? That'll keep you busy on your coffee break...

New Rough Spread for "Duck Island" Work in Progress

Another rough for my early reader book in progress. I wanted all the ducks to have a certain amount of personality and naturalistic attitude, and drew about 50 or so in total, but these were the ones that made the cut. there were a few others that I would have liked to have included, but there just wasn't room. I still have a few more pages I might squeeze them into.

Another Rough Spread For my Early Reader Book in Progress

Now that the Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle dummy is done, I'm back to the dummy for the early reader book I was working on. This one is coming along briskly! I went back and forth between portraying the ducks in a more realistic way and this more cartoony portrayal, finally opting for cartoony. It fits the tone of the story better, and gives me more options for expression.

A Review and Remembrance of Power Pack Classic by Louise Simonson and June Brigman

Power Pack was my favorite comic book.

OK, officially it was the X-Men and my favorite character was Wolverine because I knew Power Pack was a kid’s comic and wasn’t cool, even though I was 11, a year younger than the oldest of the characters in the comic, Alex..

 While most comics were 22 story pages and 75 cents, the first issue of Power Pack was a “King-Sized Collector’s item” 32 pages and a buck, my complete allowance for the week. I remember it being a lot bigger. In fact, reading it again for the first time in years, I still had to check because Louise Simonson packed (no pun intended) so much story in those 32 pages.

At the time superhero comics dominated. Archie Comics were still in print, but the Harvey Comics like Richie Rich and Hot Stuff that I had grown up on had just ceased publication just a year or two earlier. It was a time when superhero comics were still accessible to young readers, even though their readership was just beginning to skew older. So a true kid comic with true kid protagonists was not to be found anywhere. With the exception of Power Pack.

Though I first bought Power Pack at my local comic store (later I got a subscription), it could still be found on the spinner rack at grocery stores and 7-11s. A comic book was only a little more than a candy bar and just as much of an impulse item for your average kid. Not that kids don’t still buy comics, but when they do, they’re not superhero comics, and they have to commit to a graphic novel which can run 10 bucks or more, not exactly pocket money. Pamphlet comics like the kind I bought as a kid can only be purchased in comics stores at 3 to 4 bucks a pop, and they're no longer written for kids, and kids don’t buy them. The average comics shop patron is over 30, the same readers that bought superhero comics in earlier decades, grown up.

Power Pack Classic, the recently published reprint series, has been marketed to this audience. It’s sold alongside superhero books from the same era as a nostalgia product, and nostalgia is the stuff that superhero comics live and breath on. It is not marketed to kids, but Power Pack remains an excellent and very accessible kid’s comic. And thanks to Marvel’s marketing department, Kids don’t know it exists.

The Story

Four kids, Alex, Jack, Katie and Julie Power live in a beach house with their physicist dad and illustrator mom. There are reports of UFOs in the news, and Katie, the youngest, is sure she’s seen one. Katie, like C.S. Lewis’ Lucy in the Narnia books, is not immediately believed, but the UFOs were in the news and the kids are curious. They decide to camp out on their deck just in case they might catch sight of one. Jack is skeptical (or pretends to be) and Alex, the science kid, wants to see if he can see one through his new telescope.

 Katie  is the first to see what turns out to be a spaceship that’s crash-landed on the beach just behind their house.The spaceship is Friday, an artificial intelligence or “smart ship” (which in a world of smart phones and Siri turned out to be a nice bit of unintended prescience) piloted by an injured alien (nicknamed “Whitey”) with the head of a seahorse. They're being chased by lizard-like Snarks, a pernicious alien race that is after the plans for a matter-anti-matter device the kid’s physicist dad has invented. When the same device was developed by Whitey’s ancestors, his entire planet was wiped out, so it's Whitey's mission to prevent this from happening to our own planet, but the Snarks want to build the device to use as as a weapon. After searching the Power’s home the Snarks are unable to find the plans, so they abduct the kid’s parents.

What the Snarks don’t know is that the device has already been built, and is set to be tested by their Dad's boss Carmody the following day, only hours away from wiping out the earth.

Meanwhile Whitey is dying. But there’s one last hope. Among other powers, Whitey can produce force fields and teleport short distances. Before he dies he can transfer some of his powers to the kids, but it’s dangerous and might not work, or worse,could turn them into monsters. The kid’s agree that there’s nothing else to be done, and so before Whitey dies, he gives them his powers. At first the transfer doesn't seem to have worked. With the help of Friday, they try to save their parents from the Snarks, and in the attempt their powers emerge, and each of them get a different power.

The first issue ends on a cliffhanger—they’ve got to save their parents, stop the Snarks from getting the plans for the device, and stop the device from destroying the world. Since this is a superhero comic, the kids decide to each adopt superhero names, a trope that seems a lot more natural coming out of the mouths of kids than adults.

So in all of 36 pages, not only do we get an origin story and a briskly told adventure, but Louise Simonson and June Brigman manage to give each of the Power kids unique personalities, rather than the typical archetypal shorthand that often served for character development in most superhero comics at the time. These are genuine, believable kids, rare not only in comics, but in middle-grade fiction in general, which is the market where the book would easily fall if it were sold today to actual kids instead of aging adults.

One of my favorites is Jack. As a kid I identified with Alex and Julie and didn't like Jack at all, at least initially. He's always teasing--and sometimes bullying--his siblings and making smart-alacky remarks. But even in this first issue we get enough of Jack's vulnerability and insecurity to identify with him--all that bravado is just a mask for his fears. This makes it all the more admirable when he exhibits bravery and generosity as the story progresses.

The first volume of Power Pack Classic reprints the first 10 issues spanning 250 pages. And of course the kids save the world and have other adventures, and continue to develop and grow as characters in a way that few characters in superhero comics do, but I’ll let you enjoy the rest of the story on your own.

Great Feet!

I would be remiss if I didn’t talk about June Brigman, the artist who brought Simonson’s script to life. Brigman can draw believable kids with real kid bodies, a rare talent in artists who draw superheroes for a living.  I remember noticing this strange phenomenon even at the time—when some of the best of the superhero artists would draw kids they always tended to look weird. The proportions were off, the body language was exaggerated and they looked more like dwarfs than kids. Brigman's figures didn’t just look like kids, they held themselves like kids, and moved and and expressed themselves like kids. And now, as an adult and professional illustrator as I admired the art for some reason out of everything else I couldn't help thinking, “she draws such great feet!”

Even as a kid I knew the book was well-drawn—I of course had surprisingly good taste—but Brigman was also a a great storyteller. She knew how to crop an image just right to imply action. The action flowed in a way that was clear and easily readable, while a lot of superhero comics portrayed choppy breaks in the action to the point where you couldn't tell who is punching who, or what had just happened before. 

Though. as a kid I continued to follow the comic through at least half of its run, once Brigman left it was never the same. The artist who followed her, Brent Anderson--who also drew the last story in this collection--did a laudable job, but he didn’t have that talent for drawing kids that June did. As the series went on, the stories became increasingly dependent on the inclusion of other Marvel Comics characters into the mix. Even in this volume we get guest stars like Spider-Man and Cloak and Dagger. Early on, the kid’s interactions with these characters made for good stories. There’s a particularly effective tale where they have to hide Dragon Man in their basement, a child-like truck-sized monster.

I can’t help thinking that all these guest stars were a mistake. The guest stars had a tendency to pull the focus away from the kids, and Power Pack stories without them were always better for it. There was one exception: Franklin Richards, the 6 year old son of Mr. Fantastic and The Invisible Woman from The Fantastic Four, a character that Simonson and Brigman gave more life and depth to than any writer on the Fantastic Four had ever managed.

My guess is that these guest stars were included to attract more readers, but after a while it was as if they couldn’t sell the book without them. The series lasted 62 issues, but I stopped reading when Louise Simonson left earlier in its run. After Brigman left, the comic was running largely on fumes, and once Simonson was gone as well all bets were off.

Where Is Power Pack Now, When We Need it?

There have been many revivals and revamps of the characters of the years. In a desperate attempt to appeal to kids, there was even a version that was done in a more contemporary manga style. But as far as I’m concerned, this is not a franchise where the talent is interchangeable. Louise Simonson and June Brigman are the true heart of the book, and without them Power Pack isn't Power Pack.

 If Brigman and Simonson ever did revisit to the book and Marvel had the smarts to market it to its rightful audience, my hope would be that they would dispense with the guest stars and get back to focusing on the core kid characters. Tying the book to Marvel’s 1980s continuity is the only thing that makes this reprint edition less accessible to a contemporary kid audience. Otherwise I could see it selling well alongside contemporary kid-focused fantasy comics like Kazu Kibuishi’s Amulet.

 Power Pack is a rare and underappreciated gem that deserves its place among the best contemporary kid lit.

Yet another Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle Rough

Almost done with the  book dummy! I'm sure I'll need to make revisions before I send it out, but it's nice to be so close to finished. This may be my first complete traditional book dummy. I really love the process and I'm looking forward to doing many more, and (hopefully) many many actual books.

I don't think any of this will feel real until that first book sees print. Until then, a part of me feels like I'm just playing at being an illustrator. Magazine illustrations and individual commissions don't quite carry the same weight as a real off-set printed book. Handmade books and zines don't quite count either, even though I've made quite a few small odds and ends that I'm proud of.

So, hopefully, it all starts here.

Another Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle Rough: The Inside of the Pumpkin

As an shortcut I used gradients in this one, even though I hate gradients, since it's still in rough form. There won't be any gradients in the final, but in this case it was a quick way to get the point across.

I didnt' anticipate using any kind of extreme perspective in this story, but I wanted to show the contrast in size and how the characters were engulfed by the space. I felt I had two options here: To go for a bird's eye or a worm's eye view. I chose bird's eye to contrast with the image on the previous post which was from more of a worm's eye perspective, though drawing the characters foreshortened from above was a challenge. I think it worked out pretty well, though.

Another Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle Post

Another Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle rough for my dummy in progress. I'm putting this together in Indesign--it's so easy in Indesign to move pages around and get rid of pages and see the whole picture at once, a lot easier than the old cut and paste (with actual glue!), analog way. It makes revisions incredibly easy, and I don't feel so committed to the layout.

The main thing I'm worried about is word to image density. There's a lot of dialogue in the very beginning with Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle basically sitting around, and I want to spread this out in a way that's still engaging and interesting. The entire book is less than 500 words, so this is, of course, relative, but visually and compositionally I don't want any passage of text to be more than about 4 lines or in that general range. The images should be the stars of the show. Always, with a picture book, the challenge is to get the reader to turn the page, and kids can be very fickle readers. They don't have the patience of adults, and this is a relatively quiet story. So enough blogging--back to the drawing board! I hope to get this sucker done in dummy form by next monday at the latest!

Another Gentleman Beetle Rough

Here's another rough spread for my Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle book in progress. Hope everyone had a good holiday!

"I Promise" Says Gentlemen Beetle: Character and Pantomime

I went to figure drawing last night--I went earlier this month as well, but I'm still very rusty. It will take a another few sessions before I get back to form, or share any of my figures here. I really can't go that long without drawing from life without having to get back on it. So for now, more Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle.

My Favorite Model

As I put together the mock-up of the book, I'm finding that as I draw the images, lines of text become superfluous to the action. The characters body language is increasingly carrying the story, which is as it should be. The best case scenario of a picture book is that the words are as important as the pictures, and the story can't be told without both. In aid of this, I rely on my favorite model. 

One of many blurry photos that helped me get just the right gesture for this pose. What these guys lack in fingers, they make up for in arms and legs, so then it's about how to best translate human body language into bug body language.

Character and Pantomime

I based the earlier dance sequence on stills I took from Fred Estaire and Ginger Rogers. Watching the film by frames I began to really see how Ginger Rogers was at times struggling to keep up with him. I never quite realized just how good a dancer he was! But I wanted my own dance to have a little more give and take. Here's that post if you missed it. 

But often it's hard to visualize the gesture if you can't see it. I have a full length mirror in my studio, but often that's not enough, and so then it's time to prop up my camera and set the timer. Then I translate this gesture into bug anatomy, adding a little exaggeration and drama and hopefully subtlety. Cartoon anatomy has its challenges--everything is simplified and distilled.

In that earlier dance sequence linked above, one of the hardest things to do was to have Gentleman Beetle give a bow and offer his hand in that courtly manner of a traditional gentlemen. When drawing this pose, I neglected to use my favorite model, so I had to make it up from a few scant pieces of reference found online and my imagination. Little problems arose, for instance: my Gentleman Beetle lacks not only hands but a neck. All that head tilting and head raising has to be implied without a neck. His back, too, is stiff as a board, since it's all shell. So the arms legs and held tilt have to carry much of the motion. And I almost forgot to give him antennae when he took off his hat--I hadn't yet had to draw him hatless. 

The more I draw the characters, the more I get to know them and how they work in space. Sometimes they've surprise me by subtly changing the tone of a phrase written in the prose. While in the prose I said, "Ladybug smiled" when she asks Gentleman Beetle for reassurance, suggesting that she's not at all as frightened as her words suggest, here her body language could easily translate as earnest entreaty. But she's still smiling. It's not as obvious. Should it be more obvious? I decided that no, this works better. Just as Gentleman Beetle has his own mock expressions as he playfully describes the scenario, Ladybug in her own way is just as clever.

Arriving on the Island...

So I'm concentrating in the next week or so primarily on the Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle book which is going pretty briskly, but here's a rough from the early reader book I was working on before. I'll be returning to that one soon. I've been having fun with both, and barring anything unforeseen, should be back to full productivity!

Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle Dancing

So I'm making Ladybug and Gentlemen Beetle into a picture book, rather than an early reader. Here are some sketches from the dummy in progress. I've always been a fan of sequential action, so here's Ladybug and Gentleman Beetle dancing!

Another Spread for Work in Progress

Another spread. Deliberately messing with scale a little bit. Since the boat is something from their imagination, it's huge when their working on it, smaller when their in it.

How Do You Solve a Problem Like Mary Sue?

In 1973, Paula Smith wrote a story called "A Trekkie's Tale" for a Star Trek fanzine that parodied what was then becoming a common trope in fan fiction written by women. The character in the story was named "Mary Sue." As much as has been made of the story and the trope since, it's surprisingly brief. You can read it here in its entirety.

That's it. That's all there is to it. For all that's been written about the trope, and plenty has been--just Google "Mary Sue" if you're curious--it's all of about 200 words or so.

Essentially Mary Sue is a character who is talented to the point of absurdity and admired by all who come in contact with her. She achieves boundlessly and, if it comes to it, dies valiantly, a soul too good for this world.

In this insightful interview, Paula Smith herself explains the problem with the trope better than anyone I've heard so far. In her own words:

"A story demands headspace, and the Mary Sue wants to come and occupy your whole head, so the writer gets the enjoyment and not the reader. It's a little too much like being used. I suspect that's why an awful lot of people agreed with our assessment."

She also identifies one of the most problematic aspects of the trope as it relates to gender:

"I was really struck when the Doc Savage: Man of Bronze movie came out. I thought: that's a Mary Sue, too!"

"...Any of these wish-fulfillment characters [James Bond, Superman] whose presence in any universe warps it way the heck out of reality. But we don't notice that when it involves men."

Soon after the term "Mary Sue" came into popular use, Marty Sue was added to describe Mary's male counterpart, but Mary Sue was still more commonly used as a pejorative to describe female characters than Marty Sue was to describe male characters, and these canonical male characters, Superman, James Bond and Doc Savage, tended to get a free pass. 

This is why the fact that "Mary Sue" is a woman is not insignificant.

I think it’s fair to assume that male “Mary Sues” existed in fan fiction with equally blatant and amateurish prevalence well before "Mary Sue" was coined. but I also think that  the absurdity of the trope stood out all the more because the characters were women. This fact is significant if we are going to use historical precedent in our evaluation of the term.

Part of the assumptions behind these canonical characters “getting a pass” is because they initiated a certain archetype. They were the model. But women don't have the same archetypal precedents, so they’re by default disenfranchised from getting this “pass.”

In genre fiction, men have more Marty Sue leverage than women. We’re willing to permit more Marty Suishness in male characters than Mary Suishness in female characters.

What separates Marty Sues from their female counterparts is also an aggressive kind of masculinity. Idealized men are given more license to be disliked while still being held up as heroic. They can be ruthless because they are noble. Conan, Batman and Wolverine are great examples of this kind of Marty Sue. The begrudging respect they receive is sometimes treated as a character flaw, but I think it’s a false one. This character embodies a different kind of wish fulfillment. What used to be called the "anti-hero" has become the contemporary go-to Marty Sue.

The contemporary treatment of James Bond in the recent spate of films with Daniel Craig reflects an effort to try to update the Marty Sue trope, but I think this too follows the same pattern. The model is more Conan than super spy. People associate this kind of grittiness with realism, when it’s still just veneer. It’s a trait that women aren’t permitted to have, further requiring them to be more flawed by comparison. Bond has no female equals either in his films, or equivalents in other popular fiction.

On the one hand, the Mary Sue/Marty Sue trope is a useful way to point out this trend in writing. Unfortunately, it doesn't tend to be employed as equally or judiciously to both genders. It's still fundamentally about Mary Sue, and the term is generally used to vilify idealistic portrayals of women. So it’s not simply the origin of the term, but its employment, and the fact that it’s often used as ammunition to dismiss characters that have similar attributes to celebrated male characters that puts it in the realm of sexism.

When Paula Smith identified and named the trope, I don't think she intended it to be about gender. But like all language, once the term went into circulation it took on a life of its own. It became both a convenient way to identify the trope, and a convenient way to hold women to a double standard. Which isn't to say that every use of the term is inherently sexist, or identifying this trope in fiction isn't useful or even helpful as a tool for an author to look at their characters more objectively. But that double standard still exists. 

The term isn't going to go away any time soon. I think we're stuck with it. But if we're going to be pointing out all the Mary Sues we should level the same finger at all the Marty Sues. And if we're allowed our few exceptions--Batman and James Bond--then shouldn't women be able to have the same kinds of characters who embody this same kind of wish-fulfillment?

Because if not, then I don't think our Marty Sues should get off so lightly.

Addendum:

While the trope is often used as a justification for sexism, I think the Mary and Marty Sue CAN be well written. I don’t dismiss the trope. I don’t think the trope by default is an indication of bad writing. Keep in mind that Paula Smith's original piece was a PARODY, exaggerating the worst aspects of the trope, not a definition.

James Bond doesn’t get a pass. Batman doesn’t get a pass. At least not until we see female characters who embody the same archetype who are equally embraced. If precedent is the measure of these “passes” then you can hardly give a blanket dismissal to the same trend in women when they have no such precedent to go by.

But I do think there is such a thing as a well written Superman story or James Bond story. And if these canonical male characters get a pass, it should be because of a compelling story with a compelling conflict, not their precedent as archetypes. Mary Sue can be a well-written character if handled right. 

I'm Drawing!

After months of sporadic and spotty productivity as a result of my illness, I'm back to it! This is a rough spread for an early reader dummy I'm working on. This time I've done a little more homework and am confident that I can do a book that will be a good fit for the early reader market. 

This book is written at the very early end of the spectrum. One thing I noticed with some of these early reader books is a lack of scale. I think a lot of them are well done, but its as if, because the physical size of the book is small, the spaces in the images have to be small. So I'm trying to make a big world is a small package in this one with lots of full bleed spreads. Vocabulary, word count and physical size doesn't have to limit the scope of the book.